This page is work in progress
Unreasonable causal attribution: to unreasonably say that A causes B. May be known colloquially by some as "superstition", "delusion", or some other word, depending on the context. Of course, there is a level of subjectivity here. Different cultures or individuals may have diverging opinions on what is "reasonable" or "unreasonable" causal attribution. For example, many people in the 21st century may deem it "unreasonable" to believe that not sacrificing children to Tlaloc will lead to devastating droughts, whereas it was deemed "reasonable" in some Mesoamerican cultures. As for the current Zeitgeist, there also are disagreements in terms of causal attribution, for example some may deem it "reasonable" to believe that certain human activities may bring catastrophic global climate change that may possibly lead to human extinction, or at the very least severe problems for human beings and other species, whereas some other people may deem it "unreasonable" to believe in it, and may call it "fear mongering" or something like that. The same logic applies to whether or not allowing most people to own firearms will cause an increase in gun-related violence, but really it can be applied to any claim of causation. Some people may believe in objective causality, some may not, and some may hold an in-between or agnostic position. As for what happens by "chance", there can also be a multitude of beliefs regarding that, ranging from a naturalistic, physically deterministic position where things that happen by "chance" actually happen due to a chain of physical causes not easily explainable, to non-determinism, to claiming that such events are caused by a luck-related deity (e.g. the ancient Roman goddess Fortuna), or that events that happen by "chance" can be manipulated by humans into a desired outcome through magickal or other occult means, to many other beliefs. Antonym: reasonable causal attribution.